Posts Tagged ‘Nancy Pelosi’

Outrage Weds Part III: Abuse of Privilege (Part II)

Wednesday, May 18th, 2011

Speaking of waivers for the health care law, guess who also got a waiver that was announced Monday?

Nevada got a partial waiver from the health care law — a significant development that Democrats are dismissing as par for the course and Republicans are claiming as a political victory.

The Health and Human Services Department announced late Friday that Nevada had secured a statewide waiver from certain implementation requirements of the Obama administration’s health care law, because forcing them through, the department found, “may lead to the destabilization of the individual market.”

The announcement makes Nevada one of only three states to have compliance requirements under the health care bill waived.

For those of you that can’t remember, the other two are Nebraska (because of Ben Nelson’s vote aka cornhusker kickback) and Florida (I have to believe because of Chuck Crist’s party switch and Senate run against Rubio).

In some respects the Democrats are correct. This is par for the course. This is just the first time where we are actually seeing the situation so glaringly.

2,000 pages of law that “we need to pass to see what is in it” begats an estimated 130,000 to 140,000 pages of regulations written by unelected government officials. Then when you feel that you are slighted by these new regulations, you go to the very people that passed the feel good law to now go on your behalf to the officials (read regulators).

This creates a lawless society where each law is enforced irregularly based on (at the minimum the appearance of) the potential for prid pro quo to your congressional ombudsman.

Outrage Weds Part II: Abuse of Privilege

Wednesday, May 18th, 2011

What’s worse than finding a welfare cheat? Finding a welfare cheat that is a millionaire who is using food stamps after he was TOLD to continue using them by the welfare office!

AUBURN (AP) – A man who won $2 million on a Michigan lottery show has told a TV station that he still uses food stamps.

Leroy Fick of Bay County admitted he still swipes the electronic card at stores, nearly a year after winning a jackpot on “Make Me Rich!” He told WNEM-TV in Saginaw that more than half the prize went to taxes.

Fick says the Department of Human Services told him he could continue to use the card, which is paid with tax dollars. He told WNEM: “If you’re going to … try to make me feel bad, you aren’t going to do it.”

Of course we aren’t going to make Fick feel bad: he’s a scumbag. But the bigger problem here isn’t that Fick is a scumbag; it’s that the Department of Human Services knew full well that the guy had two million dollars and told him to continue using food stamps. You know, those same food stamps that are paid for by tax payers, the vast majority of which are NOT millionaires and who cannot really afford to be shelling out money out of their pockets to pay for a millionaire to eat for free? Those same food stamps that could be used by lower income families to feed their kids? Yeah, those food stamps. Oh, by the way: Fick means “fuck” in German. Just sayin’. Oh, and Fick is driving around in a new Audi convertible. Have fun digesting that one.

Speaking of welfare and/or the lack thereof, how about cheating a charity show because you’re a child-abusing grifter?

“Extreme Makeover” recipients Chuck and Terri Cerda are the parents of Molly and Maggie, 10 and 8 respectively. Terri, in her appeal to the show, said she suffers from combined immunodeficiency disease, as do her daughters, who had to wear masks to guard against the toxins coursing through the air of their rundown, mold-filled Las Vegas house. You can watch a video of Terri and the two girls posted by the Immune Deficiency Foundation above.

That was before “Extreme Makeover” transformed their abode in March 2009 into “an opulent new home that included high-quality air filtration systems, an elevator, solar-heated swimming pool, gourmet kitchen and floor-to-ceiling stone fireplace,” as The Oregonian’s Steve Mays writes. But it turned out the Cerdas “couldn’t afford the increased cost of operating the larger home. By fall 2009, the house was for sale and the family moved to Oregon.”

Now this in and of itself wouldn’t be too bad because it would just be a case of a family trying to be fiscally responsible by moving to a more affordable house, but there’s a catch:

Several doctors and a hospital social worker began to question Terri Cerda’s insistence that her daughters had chronic health problems when tests and examinations indicated otherwise. In January, Dr. Thomas Valvano, an OHSU Doernbecher Children’s Hospital pediatrician who specializes in suspected child abuse and neglect, reported the Cerdas to state child-welfare authorities, and in February, the state took temporary custody of the two girls.

Six doctors testified that Molly, 10, and Maggie, 8, did not live in constant medical peril, as Terri Cerda claimed.

Valvano went further. The Cerda children, he told the judge, were victims of medical child abuse.

And this is why I prefer to pick and choose what, if any, charities get my money. The people that really need the money and really deserve the money rarely actually ask for it and when they do, it is usually pretty easy to see that they are in dire straits. This woman used her kids and the charitable nature of people to turn a profit. If I were running the show, I would have her hanged in the town square. This is probably why they don’t allow me to run things.

Worse than using children to make money is acting like one to make money:

A key senator has asked the Social Security Administration to investigate how people who live their lives role-playing as “adult babies” are able to get taxpayer-funded disability payments – after one of them was featured on a recent reality TV episode wearing diapers, feeding from a bottle and using an adult-sized crib he built.

Sen. Tom Coburn, Oklahoma Republican and the Senate’s top waste-watcher, asked the agency’s inspector general to look into 30-year-old Stanley Thornton Jr. and his roommate, Sandra Dias, who acts as his “mother,” saying it’s not clear why they are collecting Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits instead of working.

“Given that Mr. Thornton is able to determine what is appropriate attire and actions in public, drive himself to complete errands, design and custom-make baby furniture to support a 350-pound adult and run an Internet support group, it is possible that he has been improperly collecting disability benefits for a period of time,” Mr. Coburn wrote in a letter Monday to Inspector General Patrick P. O’Carroll Jr.

Thornton sent an e-mail to the Social Security office threatening to kill himself if his checks stopped coming. I don’t see a problem with this. In fact, I think that is the best possible outcome for the situation.

And finally, what kind of “the people get screwed over because of corruption, greed, and graft” post would this be if we didn’t include Obamacare?

Of the 204 new Obamacare waivers President Barack Obama’s administration approved in April, 38 are for fancy eateries, hip nightclubs and decadent hotels in House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s Northern California district.

That’s in addition to the 27 new waivers for health care or drug companies and the 31 new union waivers Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services approved.

Pelosi’s district secured almost 20 percent of the latest issuance of waivers nationwide, and the companies that won them didn’t have much in common with companies throughout the rest of the country that have received Obamacare waivers.

That’s right: Nancy Pelosi’s Congressional District, which covers .003% of the total area of the United States and serves .2% of the US population got almost 20% of the waivers for Obamacare. Yeah, I’m sure that’s fair. Oh, and the big recipients of those waivers were luxury eateries, night clubs, and hotels. You know, the same kinds of establishments (minus the “luxury” moniker) owned by small businessmen and women that will be getting fiscally butt-raped all across the US because of the same Obamacare policies that will deny them those same waivers?

I think you are missing the point

Wednesday, April 13th, 2011

Yesterday the Weekly Standard quoted Nancy Pelosi from a Speech at Tufts. But I humbly submit that the author of the blog missed the point.

To my Republican friends: take back your party. So that it doesn’t matter so much who wins the election, because we have shared values about the education of our children, the growth of our economy, how we defend our country, our security and civil liberties, how we respect our seniors. Because there are so many things at risk right now — perhaps in another question I’ll go into them, if you want. But the fact is that elections shouldn’t matter as much as they do…But when it comes to a place where there doesn’t seem to be shared values then that can be problematic for the country, as I think you can see right now.

The line that got their attention was:

But the fact is that elections shouldn’t matter as much as they do.

And while I will admit that is interesting coming from the party of “we won” and “you can ride on the bus, in the back”, there is something else.

To my Republican friends: take back your party. So that it doesn’t matter so much who wins the election…

Take a moment to let that sink in.

Elites (Republicans) take back what is yours (your party).

So we don’t have to worry about shrinking the government. Back when the only discussion is how quickly the government grows. When the nation’s treasury was a candy jar to be raided by both parties to give to groups that could help keep them in office.

And when the choices on the ballot were either Democrat or Democrat-lite. Cause “no conservative could win _____”

Back to the days when the majority of Republican candidates paid lip service to conservative ideals then would drop them once they hit the Country Club that is Capital Hill. “You got to understand, we need to work together”

Back before when the main concern for Republicans was being liked by the media and the Democrats. And the second concern was to make sure they got “their turn” to run for whatever office they chose.

Some of us have known there was no (or minimal) difference between Democrats and Republicans. We were called “kooks”, “racists”, “bigots” and “third-party wackos”.

And now you have stated what we knew to be right. Thanks for putting it in focus, Nancy.

The Cart Before The Horse

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

You know that phrase? Putting the cart before the horse? That’s when you put something out of logical progressive order like frosting a cake before you bake it or skinning the cow before you slaughter it or marrying the girl before she’s pregnant… or even worse, pimping your ill-conceived, ill-planned, and unwelcome health care plan after you already pass the damned thing.

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama is preparing to sign a transformative health care bill ushering in near-universal medical coverage for the first time in the nation’s history — and then hit the road to sell it to a reluctant public.

I’m sure the people won’t catch on to the fact that this bill (soon to be law of the land) was crammed down everyone’s collective throat despite the fact that a vast majority of the country saw it for the turd it is and didn’t want it. I’m sure we’ll just be hypnotized by the President’s teleprompters’ words and sway like the cobras in the sound waves of a snake charmer’s flute as he tells us ignorant masses just how much we wanted this package of dung despite the fact that we told Congress again and again that it was garbage that we didn’t want to touch with a ten foot pole, let alone fund.

For those out there that would argue that the masses wanted it, tell me this: why the hell does the president have to go out and “sell” a health care plan that everyone wanted after it’s already federal law? Because they didn’t want it and he thinks we’re stupid enough to eat the shite he’s going to be shoveling and ask for seconds. I’m sure the next elections are going to be a RUDE awakening for those who ignore the mandates from the masses.

Did we need health insurance reform? Sure we did… but this sure as hell was not the answer. To say that this is the best answer to our need for health care reform is the same as saying that the best answer for a woman who wants to get laid is to be forcible raped.

Seperated At Birth

Sunday, March 14th, 2010

Please tell me I’m not the only one who sees the resemblance…

What A Horrible Woman

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

Amen, brother. And this is coming from CNN, not FOX or Rush Limbaugh or the intertoobz. I think everyone’s had it with her and her ilk… everyone. If there’s ever another bloody revolution in America I can almost guarantee that some pissed off, unemployed construction worker from her own state whose kid is starving will string her up first.

Like Rosie O’Donnell Calling Michael Moore A Fat Idiot

Friday, November 20th, 2009

MIDEAST SYRIA US PELOSI

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Afghan President Hamid Karzai is an “unworthy partner” who does not deserve a big boost either in U.S. troops or civilian aid, U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi said.

Pelosi, a skeptic on sending more troops to Afghanistan, also said in an interview with National Public Radio aired on Friday that there was not strong support among her fellow Democrats in Congress for “any big ramp-up of troops” to oppose resurgent Taliban forces.

I’m pretty sure that Nancy used that “[there isn't any] strong support” for sending in more troops to get the job done before. I can’t remember when they voted on something like that previously, but maybe the memory of that vote will SURGE into my mind at some point. Nancy, if there is anyone “unworthy” of a nation’s trust or support, it’s you. Oh, and one question for you madam speaker: When you are introduced do you prefer to go by “kettle” or “pot”?

Nancy Likes Disruptors

Sunday, August 16th, 2009

Well, unless you’re a disrupting Republican.

Look, I don’t mind if you like disruptors or not… but don’t change your tune based on your political party.

Well, that depends on the definition of "knew" is…

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

I sure hope you have on your political leotard for this session of gymnastics.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi learned in early 2003 that the Bush administration was waterboarding terror detainees but didn’t protest directly out of respect for “appropriate” legislative channels, a person familiar with the situation said Monday.

Her former staffer was briefed and wrote a memo to the CIA questioning the policy. That staffer’s memo was approved by Pelosi.

And as the minority leader she had sure kept her trap shut about EVERYTHING else! Not so much.

The Pelosi camp’s version of events is intended to answer two key questions posed by her critics: When, precisely, did she first learn about waterboarding? And why didn’t she do more to stop it?

She admits she knew in 2003, but was told in 2002.

Pelosi has disputed a CIA document, released last week, that shows she was briefed in September 2002 on the “particular” interrogation techniques the United States had used on Al Qaeda leader Abu Zubaydah. Pelosi has said she was told then only that the Bush administration was considering using certain techniques in the future — and that it had the legal authority to do so.

Come on Nancy, don’t make us wait until next Monday for you to admit to 2002. You afraid to be the subject of the Sunday Morning talk shows?

Much Ado about Something.

Monday, May 11th, 2009

The current news cycle is revolving around:

A) The noted politician David Feherty’s (ok, he is a CBS golf commentator and self professed amateur comedian) joke.

“If you gave any U.S. soldier a gun with two bullets in it, and he found himself in an elevator with Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Osama Bin Laden, there’s a good chance that Nancy Pelosi would get shot twice, and Harry Reid and Bin Laden would be strangled to death.”

B) David Feherty’s coverage and comparing it to the coverage of comedian Wanda Sykes joke.

You know, you might want to look into this, [President Obama], because I think maybe Rush Limbaugh was the 20th hijacker, but he was just so strung out on OxyContin he missed his flight. …

“Rush Limbaugh hopes the country fails? I hope his kidneys fail, how ’bout that?”

BUT here is where the press (left wing if covering A, right wing if covering B) is missing the boat.

How about comparing David Feherty’s Joke to another of Wanda Sykes’ joke?

In that joke, Ms. Sykes wanted to know who’s idea it was to send BHO and Joe Biden out together for a burger. Ms. Sykes suggested it was Nancy Pelosi.

So now you have one joke by a comedian about a soldier killing the #3 in line for the presidency and another joke by a different comedian about that #3 trying to knock off #1 and 2.

Compare and Discuss.

Let’s Face It, He Wasn’t Too Far Off The Mark

Monday, May 11th, 2009

PONTE VEDRA BEACH, Fla. — CBS Sports golf analyst David Feherty apologized Sunday to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for a morbid joke that went bad in a Dallas magazine.

Feherty, one of the most popular golf analysts for his sharp wit and self-deprecating humor, was among five Dallas residents who wrote for “D Magazine” on former President George W. Bush moving to Dallas.

“From my own experience visiting the troops in the Middle East, I can tell you this though,” Feherty wrote toward the end of his column.

“Despite how the conflict has been portrayed by our glorious media, if you gave any U.S. soldier a gun with two bullets in it, and he found himself in an elevator with Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Osama bin Laden, there’s a good chance that Nancy Pelosi would get shot twice, and Harry Reid and bin Laden would be strangled to death.”

I do have to disagree with Feherty’s comment at the end, though. No self respecting troop would strangle anybody when they could more easily do the job with a butt-stroke to the head series. Other than that, he’s probably spot-on.

Well, At Least Now Politicians Are Being Open About Wanting To Screw Us

Friday, May 8th, 2009

No. Really. Check this out…
Stormy Daniels strode onstage at a downtown Baton Rouge restaurant in a tight black blouse with a plunging neckline and a knee-length skirt in the popular purple of Louisiana State University. She introduced herself with a warning.

“For those of you who don’t know who I am,” she told the lunch crowd at The Roux House, “I’d suggest that you don’t Google that until you get home from work.”

She’s a Louisiana-born porn star who says she is considering a 2010 run for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Republican David Vitter, whose family-values reputation was marred in 2007 when his name was linked to a Washington prostitution ring.
Will she actually run? I seriously have no idea if she will but it would be a veritable gold mine for me if she did. In fact, I would love to see her not only run, but win… just as long as Mary Carey (porn star and political hopeful; R-CA) would also run for one of the two California Senate seats and win. Think of the debates on the floor! I mean literally on the floor! The term “filibuster” could be replaced by “fill a bustier” or “fill ‘er up, buster!” And the best part? Henry Waxman would still not be able to get female company on Capitol Hill despite having two professional sex workers in congress! Let’s face it; there have been a lot of politicians prostituting themselves in Congress for decades if not centuries… why not make it official?

Oh, and the best quip from her “listening tour” was this gem:

“You look familiar. Not your face, though,” said Jody Mathern, 51, a New Orleans man who said he works in the oil industry, drawing laughs from Daniels and a table full of oil patch workers. “She’s a whole lot prettier than Vitter. But I still don’t know what color her eyes are.” Besides, I’m certain that if one of my lobbyist friends had to go convince Democratic Senator to vote their way I’m certain they would prefer this… To this…
Although of the two lobbyists that I know well enough to count among my friends, one would forget his arguments when he caught sight of her cleavage and the other would do the same thing at the sight of her faaabulous shoes. BUT, if either one of my buddies could keep his head, he could use the phrase “Madam Senator, please quit doing to (our troops?) what you did to Ron Jeremy in ‘The Wizard of Ahhhhs II’ and again in ‘The Curious Case of Bending My Butt In’.”

(By the way Greta, if you get your hands on this one you better give me an inside line! I know you’ve got your hand on the pulse of what Vitter had his hands on, so gimme the scoop!)

HURRY UP! Wait……

Sunday, February 15th, 2009

After pushing Congress for weeks to hurry up and pass the massive $787 billion stimulus bill, President Obama promptly took off for a three-day holiday getaway.

Obama arrived at his home in Chicago on Friday, and treated wife Michelle to a Valentine’s Day dinner downtown last night. The couple was spotted leaving upscale Table Fifty-Two, which specializes in Southern cuisine, with the first lady toting what appeared to be a doggie bag.

The president plans to spend the Presidents’ Day weekend in the Windy City, and is not expected to sign the bill until Tuesday, when he travels to Denver to discuss his economic plan.

So had Pelosi cancelled her Rome trip they could have waited until Sunday / Monday to vote and we would have had the time to READ THE FLIPPIN’ BILL?

And this just in.

“This historic step won’t be the end of what we do to turn our economy around, but rather the beginning.”

– Obama Saturday

Nice!

No Earmarks Here, No Sir, Well…

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

President-elect Barack Obama has met with his team of economic advisers in Washington and said the government must get its own fiscal house in order. He said new spending in the stimulus package will be carefully monitored, and won’t include earmarks.

NPR, 6 January 2009

In late-stage talks, Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., pressed for $8 billion to construct high-speed rail lines, quadrupling the amount in the bill that passed the Senate on Tuesday.

Reid’s office issued a statement noting that a proposed Los Angeles-to-Las Vegas rail might get a big chunk of the money.

AP, 12 February 2009 4:00 AM.

Lawmakers and administration officials divulged Wednesday that the $789 billion economic stimulus bill being finalized behind closed doors in Congress includes $30 million for wetlands restoration that the Obama administration intends to spend in the San Francisco Bay Area to protect, among other things, the endangered salt marsh harvest mouse.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi represents the city of San Francisco and has previously championed preserving the mouse’s habitat in the Bay Area.

Washington Time, 12 February 2009

These words you use don’t mean what you think they mean….

Saturday, January 31st, 2009

“I didn’t come here to be partisan. I didn’t come here to be bipartisan. I came here, as did my colleagues, to be nonpartisan, to work for the American people, to do what is in their interest.”

– Nancy Pelosi, After the (non-)Stimulus Vote.