Posts Tagged ‘Morons’

Inventing History

Tuesday, August 9th, 2011

Several months ago (hell, it could have been longer than that) TSO from This Ain’t Hell and I got into a debate about whether the study of history was an art or a science. It was my opinion that it was an art and TSO was of the opinion that it was a science. The debate got somewhat heated as it sometimes does when we disagree and as is the case in so many of our tete a tetes it was a stalemate. As a history major, I have been studying history ad nauseum since then and in the interceding months I have started to drift toward to his camp although not completely. The reason for this change of heart is that I don’t think that you can classify the study of history as purely one or the other because it is governed by aspects of both. There is a method to researching and writing history and this method is governed by rules that make it fairly easy to look at any given document that purports to give a rendition of history and determine the veracity of the research involved in the creation of that document and also makes it fairly easy to determine bias. The key to good historical renditions is research and citation. If you can’t cite your facts, they aren’t facts. And this brings me to the subject of this post: unsubstantiated revisionist history.

What historians would call unsubstantiated revisionist history is what everybody else in the world calls horseshit. A good example of this kind of horseshit is the urban legend that Mikey from the Life Cereal commercials died because he ate Pop Rocks and drank a soda. Another good one is the one where the person telling the story talks about his brother’s friend’s uncle who went to Mexico and brought home a stray dog and it turned out to be a rat when they went to have it groomed. Or the one kid in high school that you knew damned well hadn’t seen a real, live vagina since he came out of one yet claimed to have numerous girlfriends in Canada. This is the kind of horseshit I am talking about. Most of it is harmless bullshit spouted by blowhards trying to look cool. Then there is the variety that seeks to malign good men and besmirch the sacrifice they render in service to our country. Like this:

by Julius Sequerra

31 American military personnel were killed when the Boeing Chinook helicopter in which they were flying crashed in Afghanistan.

Of the thirty-one killed, twenty were members of SEAL Team 6.

More importantly, I’ve been reliably informed (by a retired Colonel, US Army intel) that these very same operatives were the men who allegedly killed Usama bin Laden recently in Abbottabad.  [NB: Seal Team 6 is an ultra-elite group of "black" operatives who exist outside military protocol, engage in operations that are at the highest level of classification, and often outside the bounds of international law.]

The official story is that the Taliban shot down the chopper. I have my doubts (as do many others far more savvy than yours truly).

[Remember Pat Tillman, the Pro Football star who forsook a megabuck contract and volunteered to go fight in Afghanistan in the heat of the post-9/11 patriotic frenzy? The official story is that Tillman was killed in a friendly-fire incident. According to reports from several US military personnel (a few of whom I know), Pat Tillman was assassinated by his own government. Reportedly, Tillman, the quintessential poster-boy for military recruitment, was waking up to the 9/11 lie, and was beginning to get a little too loose-lipped for his own good. Word traveled up the chain fast. Three bullets to the head fired at close range killed him. Friendly-fire indeed.]

“We are never deceived; we deceive ourselves.” – Goethe

Usama’s “recent death” brings to mind photos that made international headlines during the Iraq invasion.

Remember that iconic image of cheering Iraqis helping bring down the statue of Saddam? A Marine I know told me he had a friend who was actually there, on the ground, in that town square. Evidently, there were no more than 50 Iraqis in that “cheering crowd” — and virtually all of them were paid to participate in the photo shoot. [Did you happen to notice there was only one tightly cropped shot from just one camera angle? The rest of the square was virtually empty, save for US military personnel and equipment.]

Then there was that other classic shot, of a bearded and bedraggled Saddam crawling out of a hole with his hands pathetically held up in the air in a gesture of utter defeat. Remember that one?

Again, rigged. I’m personally acquainted with a former Marine who knows one of the guys who actually helped stage that sordid affair.

Truth is, Saddam was finally cornered in the home of one of his friends, and he fought valiantly to the last bullet. He was eventually nabbed, mussed up further (he apparently didn’t look great to begin), physically forced into the hole, and dirt thrown on him for good measure to ensure a Hollywood-grade image. That photo’s singular intent was to demoralize the Iraqi populace by showing their leader cowering in abject defeat.

Usama bin Laden’s REAL Death

It is generally known by military insiders (and others who look to alternative sources for their news) that Usama bin Laden died of natural causes in 2001. He had just returned to Pakistan from Dubai following medical treatment at the American Hospital.

As early as March, 2000, Asia Week expressed concern for bin Laden’s health, describing a serious medical problem that could put his life in danger because of “a kidney infection that is propagating itself to the liver and requires specialized treatment.”

Having taken off from Quetta in Pakistan, bin Laden arrived in Dubai and was transferred to the American Hospital. He was accompanied by his personal physician and a ‘faithful lieutenant’ (possibly al-Zawahiri). Usama was admitted to the well-respected urology department run by Dr. Terry Callaway, an American gallstone and infertility specialist.

Bin Laden was checked into one of the hospital’s VIP suites. While there, he received visits from many members of his family as well as prominent Saudis and Emiratis. During the hospital stay, the local CIA agent, known to many in Dubai, was seen taking the main elevator of the hospital to bin Laden’s floor.

A few days later, the CIA man bragged to a few friends about having visited bin Laden. Reliable sources report that on July 15th, the day after bin Laden returned to Quetta, the CIA agent was recalled to headquarters.  [NB: Contacts between the CIA and bin Laden began in 1979 when, as a representative of his family's business, he began recruiting volunteers for the Afghan resistance against the Soviet Red Army.]

The LAST ‘Death’ of bin Laden

What the world has been told about the recent “Death of Usama bin Laden” is pitiful and laughably absurd (especially the parts about no forensic tests having been performed, and the body quickly dumped into the sea. That last doctored photo was the clincher).

Truth is, bin Laden’s bin dead a long time.

The charade in Abbottabad was one massive a psyop to provide soothing peace of mind for the American public subject to full-throttle media propaganda, while continuing, unabatedly, one of the greatest, deadliest, and most expensive hoaxes of all time: 9/11 and “The War on Terror.”

And now, every single SEAL Team 6 member who was involved in the ‘assassination’ psyop is dead.

Incidentally, I had to smile when I saw one particularly amusing headline re Usama’s latest death, in the US publication Business Insider: “Meet The ‘Seal Team 6′, The Bad-Asses Who Killed Osama Bin Laden”

Well, all those hapless ‘bad asses’ are now dead.

And dead men don’t talk.

Okay, let me pick this pile of shit apart one peanut and one kernel of corn at a time:

I’ve been reliably informed (by a retired Colonel, US Army intel). Really? How about a name? Oh, you don’t have a name? That’s probably because that guy is either a) not reliable, b) not an actual Colonel, c) not actually intel, or (more likely) not actually a real person.

outside the bounds of international law. I hate to burst your bubble, junior, but there really isn’t any international law code. It’s really just treaties and those get broken and violated all the time. Welcome to the real world.

many others far more savvy than yours truly. Again, I hate to burst your bubble, junior, but just about everybody on the planet is more savvy than you. A glue-huffing, retarded rhesus monkey with blunt head trauma is more savvy than you. Just sayin’.

According to reports from several US military personnel (a few of whom I know). Again, can we have names? No? Why not? Because they don’t exist? Oh yeah, gotcha.

Pat Tillman was assassinated by his own government. Reportedly, Tillman, the quintessential poster-boy for military recruitment, was waking up to the 9/11 lie, and was beginning to get a little too loose-lipped for his own good. Word traveled up the chain fast. Assassinated because he somehow discovered a White House level conspiracy while he was an E-4 in a shit hole in Afhganistan? Really? Again, where is the evidence? Oh, there isn’t any? Color me shocked.

A Marine I know told me he had a friend who was actually there… Wow, that sounds a lot like the examples of horseshit stories I mentioned earlier in the post, doesn’t it? I had a friend who was actually a hamster who was friends with a gerbil that was actually in Richard Gere’s ass and found Jimmy Hoffa. It’s true!

there were no more than 50 Iraqis in that “cheering crowd” — and virtually all of them were paid to participate in the photo shoot. Uh, really?

Yeah, that sure looks like only 50 dudes. You may want to learn how to count, junior.

I’m personally acquainted with a former Marine who knows one of the guys who actually helped stage [Sadam Hussein's capture]. Really? Another guy that knows another guy that knows a dude that heard it from a transvestite surgeon from Zurich that knows James Bond that blah blah blah fucking blah.

Truth is, Saddam was finally cornered in the home of one of his friends, and he fought valiantly to the last bullet. Uh-huh. So let me get this straight: Sadam was in a firefight and fought to the last bullet, yet somehow was miraculously untouched by any bullets from the guys shooting at him? So he just emptied his magazines and nobody shot back? That isn’t just bullshit, that’s an entirely new category of fecal fallacy. That’s more like brontosaurus shit or the entire sewer system of San Francisco in one, big, steaming pile of ludicrous lunatic dishonesty. Oh yeah, and you would have to be an idiot to believe it and an even bigger idiot to try to propagate it.

It is generally known by military insiders (and others who look to alternative sources for their news) that Usama bin Laden died of natural causes in 2001. So what “military insiders” would those be? What, no names again? So in other words what you really mean is “I made some shit up to try to support my batshit crazy rants and my own, personal, exceedingly batshit crazy opinion that Osama died in 2001 despite making live videos years later.” Dude, you need help. May I suggest taking Thorazine or lithium or a .45 to the base of the skull?

A few days later, the CIA man bragged to a few friends about having visited bin Laden. You obviously don’t know any CIA agents. I do. They don’t brag about ops. Ever. It gets them killed. Jesus Christ, this guy is a stupid shit.

Reliable sources report. Translation: “The voices in my head tell me…”

What the world has been told about the recent “Death of Usama bin Laden” is pitiful and laughably absurd. This is the best part. He calls it absurd, yet doesn’t offer any supporting evidence, any corroborating testimony, or any version of what supposedly “really” happened. I have seen homeless guys babbling on the street and playing in their own feces that make more cogent arguments.

The charade in Abbottabad was one massive a psyop to provide soothing peace of mind for the American public subject to full-throttle media propaganda, while continuing, unabatedly, one of the greatest, deadliest, and most expensive hoaxes of all time: 9/11 and “The War on Terror.” So let me get this straight: killing the bad guy is how you continue the war? Then why the hell did World War II end? Or was that another hoax? So, when the cops shoot a bad guy, they are only doing so to propagate the myth that crime exists?

And now, every single SEAL Team 6 member who was involved in the ‘assassination’ psyop is dead. Well, no, actually they aren’t. And now that you mention it, who exactly would be the one to do the killing? Another black ops guy, right? And what would make him think that he wouldn’t get killed to keep that quiet? Yeah, it’s a fucking farce. Soldiers don’t shoot each other on purpose (instances of purposeful fratricide are rare) and they sure as shit don’t do it as part of a cover up for Big Brother.

Incidentally, I had to smile when I saw one particularly amusing headline re Usama’s latest death, in the US publication Business Insider: “Meet The ‘Seal Team 6′, The Bad-Asses Who Killed Osama Bin Laden”. Smiled? Really?

Well, all those hapless ‘bad asses’ are now dead. Um, no. All of those badasses aren’t dead. In fact, there are lot more of them out there than you think and if I were a betting man I would put even money on one of them punching your teeth down your throat, pulling your asshole out through your mouth, and watching you slowly die as you try to swallow your own rectum back down to its original location while one of his buddies comments that he didn’t even break a sweat or spill his beer. Sleep well, douchebag. And if you can’t support your bullshit accusations, it would probably be best if you kept your lunatic rants to yourself.

Full Scale Moonbattery In Sant Barbera

Monday, July 21st, 2008


H/T to our favorite (and as far as I know, only) Ronald Reagan-tramp-stamped writer.

More Code Pink Garbage At Berkley

Friday, February 15th, 2008

H/T to Skye at Midnight Blue

I Hate PETA

Saturday, January 12th, 2008

Now, I usually try to avoid giving any press to those who are obviously and blatantly pandering for it but I will make a small exception in this case. PETA is now trying to equate cannibalism (in general, the act of eating the flesh of your own kind but in this case the reprehensible criminal practice of eating the flesh of another human being) with the ancient and time honored act of hunkering down to a nice piece of cooked herd animal. I know that this isn’t the first time they’ve done this, but the tactic still annoys me to no end and drives me to a near violent rage when I consider the fact that these asshats value the life of a chicken more than they value the lives of human beings.

Their latest foray into epic idiocy? Demanding that the Smith County Jail where Christopher Lee McCuin is being held for murder and cannibalism be subjected to a totally vegetarian diet because eating animals is the same as murder and cannibalism. Okay, so the savage murder and [alleged] consumption of a sentient human being is the same as the humane and anesthetized processing of a chicken (with the cognitive powers of, well, a chicken)? Gimme a break.

I understand that this is a publicity stunt. Hell, the Eco-thugs at PETA admit that it’s a publicity stunt (although they use the term “…to raise the consciousness of the public that eating meat is cruel.”) but that still doesn’t clear them of the egregious offense of equating sentient human life with that of lesser intellects such as birds, cows, PETA members and Code Pinkers. Fer Krissakes, can’t someone install a faulty propane heater in their headquarters and pass out organic candles for them to burn in memoriam of the poor innocent cows that met their untimely demise dancing on my grill in nice Thai BBQ sauce?

Better yet, let’s just drop them in the jungle without anything but a knife and their wits and see how long they last against all of the other vegan animals. I’m sure there’s a tiger out there that only attacks tofu-beasts.

The Cops Who Shot The Tiger Obviously Didn’t Honk

Friday, December 28th, 2007

This LONE protester was out in SanFran protesting because she thought the police should have used a tranquilzer gun to take down Tigger instead of the firearms that they were carrying and with which they had trained. As you can probably guess, she got very few honks… even in the looney hotbet that is Norhtern California.

Don’t taze me Pooh!

PC Police Go Off The Deep End. Target: Santa

Thursday, November 15th, 2007

SYDNEY (AFP) – Santas in Australia’s largest city have been told not to use Father Christmas’s traditional “ho ho ho” greeting because it may be offensive to women, it was reported Thursday.

Okay folks, now we’ve gone waayyy too far. If we’re pandering to the sensibilities of an overly sensitive and ill educated urbanized demographic that can’t tell the difference between the signature laugh of a centuries old and timeless children’s icon and a derisive, misogynistic, and apparently repetitive term for prostitutes, then we really have gotten of the path. If some women take personal offense at Santa making a “ho ho ho” sound as he laughs, perhaps they should spend more time in English 101 classes and less time using hip hop clubs as an advertising venue for renting out their mucous membranes.

AN OPEN LETTER TO HUNGER STRIKERS

Friday, November 9th, 2007
Benefits of a liberal eduation: a hunger striker at Columbia University

Yesterday, I read an article about hunger strikers who were protesting some perceived injustice or another at Columbia University. I didn’t pay a lot of attention to it, because I was already snowblind to hunger strikers after reading about a hunger strike in the former Soviet republic of Georgia and – get this – a hunger strike in Ethopia protesting against Beyonce Knowles.

Leaving aside the knee-slapping joke possibilities about a hunger strike in Ethopia, I’d like to address this letter to those hunger strikers and anyone else who chooses this dumbass form of protest.

Dear Inbred Douchebags,

What in the world makes you think we care of you eat or not? If you don’t want to eat, fine by me. Even if I agree with your cause, you’ve picked the dumbest form of protest imaginable and should be ignored accordingly. Just die.

Sincerely,

Skvoznyak

H/T to Jay Leno…Jay, it’s a HUNGER strike in ETHOPIA. I just gave you weeks worth of monologue material – please use it.

More Lunatic Fun

Wednesday, October 24th, 2007


Everytime a Code Pinker goes down, the video goes up. The rougher the take down, the better.

Doesn’t This Look Like A "MoveOn" Or "Code Pink" Poster?

Thursday, September 13th, 2007
It does! It could be any ad in the New York Times or The Daily Kos… but it’s actually an anti-american propaganda poster by the Nazis at the end of WW II. It was made in 1944… you know, just a year before we won.

And what do you know! There’s something almost EXACTLY like it! Good job traitors!

Rabbit Pellet of the Week #1 Goes to USA Today

Wednesday, August 15th, 2007

Today’s lead editorial in USA Today, the most widely-read newspaper in the country, is the seventh in their every-now-and-then series on immigation and shows you how balanced and objective they are. Anyone familiar with this paper has read its point-counterpoint knows the paper almost always takes the leftist view, and today’s edition is no different – it took the leftist view on immigration, which unfortunately is supported by the Spender-in-Chief.

Let’s take a look at some of the leftist drivel we’ve come to expect from the paper – in today’s lead editorial (linked above), piece-by-piece, to which I will add my commentary (in red).

Our view on immigration: Washington’s failure triggers anti-immigrant backlash

No, the only backlash is against illegal “immigrants,” and it’s fully justifued. Taxpayers are forced to support them through bloated social programs, people crash our borders to have anchor babies and then rely on assclowns like Michael Chertoff to call breaking up such families “heartbreaking,” the amount of crime committed by illegals is staggering, countries like Mexico act as if exporting unemployment / poverty / crime to us is a right, illegals march in protest of “rights” they don’t have, and anyone who objects is called a “racist” or a “hater.” That’s just for starters, and it’s because of things like this that there is a backlash.

As Congress has failed to revamp the nation’s infuriating, unjust and unworkable immigration policies, states and communities across the USA have taken matters into their own hands.

The only “infuriating” part is Washington’s failure to enforce our laws, secure our borders and deport criminals. The use of “unworkable” is absurd, since there has never been a real attempt to secure our borders. As for “unjust,” this just shows to show you how liberal this paper is on this issue – immigration to the states, even legally, is not a right. The assbags at USA Today continue to act as if it is.

The result?

Dozens of infuriating, unjust, unworkable — and often heartless — immigration policies.

No, dozens of effective, overdue, highly justified policies which are “heartbreaking” only if your name is Michael Chertoff or you’re one of the rectal pustules who agrees with him.

Consider what happened in Hazleton, Pa., one of the first communities to adopt a measure designed to drive away illegal immigrants. The law was passed in 2006 and has been embroiled in litigation ever since. Last month, a federal judge overturned it. Yet, in its brief life, the measure has done serious harm.

No, it’s sent a serious message that we’re sick and tired of this crap. The only people being harmed are the people here legally who are either forced to support illegals or become illegals’ crime victims. I work for the D.C. Police and have seen dozens of estimates, all of which state that illegals kill an average of 25 people a day in this country. That’s three times the number of people we lost on 9/11 and doesn’t even take into account the number of assaults, rapes, robberies and theft American citizens suffer at the handle of illegals because the federal government would rather lick an illegal’s rectum than put it in prison.

A Mexican businessman, a legal resident who has made Hazleton home for 16 years, told the court that his restaurant folded after customers felt intimidated by a police car that often parked across the street.

Oh, boo (expletive deleted) hoo. That businessman was aiding and abetting illegals and should have been arrested for not turning them in. He had no right to profit off the presence of people here illegaly, and if his business is contingent on the illegal alien demographic in the area, it SHOULD be closed. Note how USA Today throws out statements like this and actually expects you to feel sorry for the restaurant owner. I don’t.

The leader of a local Hispanic group — a U.S. citizen — got hate mail.

First of all, what did he do to warrant a letter? And second of all, please define “hate mail.” I get called a “hater” and a “racist” just for saying that I don’t support illegal “immigration.” My guess is that this guy claimed that illegals have “rights” or “deserve” certain social services and someone sent him a hearty STFU – which USA Today would no doubt call “hate mail.” If that in fact is the case, I hope someone tells me who wrote the letter so that I can reimburse him or her for the stamp.

Show my opinion about illegals to any illegals supporter and see if I don’t get hate mail, too. Why not drop a line to Michelle Malkin and ask her what sort of mail she gets from people who support illegals? “Hate mail?” Boo (expletive deleted) hoo. People on both sides of any controversial issue get hate mail. If there was a threat in that letter, call the police. If not, STFU and grow a thicker skin.

And the publisher of a Spanish-language newspaper, also a U.S. citizen, had to be escorted by police from a rally of the measure’s supporters after the crowd turned on him, shouting “get out of the country.”

If he supports illegals in any way, I hope he takes their advice.

That’s just some of the collateral damage in one small city.

“Collateral damage,” my ass – I haven’t heard anything so far that’s nearly as bad as people here legally – such as Bush, Cheney, or basically any Republican – are called every day. News flash to those who don’t care about honest taxpayers getting screwed: when you get the shaft shoved down your throat for years, eventually you bite back. Were the guy who got a NastyGram and the guy who was yelled at treated any worse than the numerous victims committed by illegals in Hazelton were?

Around the nation, about 40 communities and at least a half dozen states — from Arizona to Oklahoma to Georgia — have passed immigration laws, some imposing draconian fines or other harsh sanctions on those who hire illegal immigrants or rent to them.

Whatever USA Today’s definition of “draconian” is, I’m willing to bet it’s a relative slap on the wrist. Anyone who aids and abets an illegal should receive prison time and confiscation of belongings. This is a fine example of the rhetoric the libs at Estados Unidos Today use – “draconian,” “unjust,” “hate mail,” etc. They never define these terms, but they throw them around left and right and expect the use of these words to tug at your heartstrings.

On one level, those responses can be seen as reasonable. They are actions directed at curbing illegal behavior that the community sees as harmful and that the federal government has failed for decades to address. Illegal immigrants stream across borders. Others who enter legally overstay their visas. Businesses ignore laws against hiring them, and today, the nation is home to about 12 million illegal immigrants, many of whom place a burden on local schools and hospitals.

Even in their transparent attempt to look objective, these assbags reveal their bias with the use of the figure “12 million.” The actual number, according to every estimate I’ve seen on desks of those who work in law enforcement, is roughly twice that amount.

Even so, trying to fix this huge mess piecemeal makes no more sense than each state and city adopting its own foreign policy.

The goal of the libs who run that rag is, mind you, to have the federal government control everything. Individual states have plenty of their own policies (examples: taxation, guns, tuition, education, speed limits, etc.) and none have led to disaster.

Immigration is a huge national problem that requires a comprehensive national solution.

Which will be created and enforced by the same federal government that USA Today freely admits can’t handle the problem? Sorry, jerkoffs, but letting states handle it makes far more sense. States who support illegals can coddle them with cradle-to-grave care and ubiquitous translation services, and states which don’t can kick their asses to one of the sanctuary states.

Local laws will just move people from one community or state to the next where the environment is less hostile, or they’ll burrow even deeper into the underground economy. Few are likely to leave the country.

If laws are enforced as they’re supposed to be and we drop our “catch and release” policy, plenty will leave the country, voluntarily or otherwise. The rest will go to the areas that are friendliest towards illegals – in other words, the most liberal places in the nation. The destruction they will effect and the strain they’ll put on social services will eventually force individual Soviet socialist cities to cut back and demonstrate what a failure liberal economics is.

In any case, the strategy isn’t holding up in court. In six cases, challengers have managed to knock down or postpone the effect of local ordinances.

The editor forgot to add “And every time it happens, we party like it’s 1999.” The Hazelton law was thrown out by a Clinton-appointed judge, which means that cities looking to follow Hazelton’s example are simply now being more careful in their legal wording. Eventually, they’ll get it right to the point where even the Clintonista judges can’t look past their love of illegals.

Amid the stalemate in Congress, the Bush administration last week announced another push to make employers obey laws against hiring illegal immigrants. At least that’s the right level of government to be enforcing federal law.

Any level of law enforcement by those rightfully commissioned to wear a badge will do when the feds refuse to enforce their own laws. Note, of course, that to USA Today the federal government is the only level of government that matters when state and local enforcement are at odds with the paper’s agenda.

But until the nation has a credible guest worker program — and a path to citizenship for the millions already here — harsh enforcement will achieve little.

If you ever needed an example of the paper’s leftist view on this issue, here it is: “Harsh enforcement will achieve little.” How would these limp-wristed lickers of illegal bunghole know that? Every time it’s even tried, the editors het their panties in a knot.

Hey, USA Today, try this: “But until the nation has a credible second chance program — and a path to freedom for the millions in jail — harsh enforcement will achieve little.” If we ignore all laws, we’ll have no criminals!

The illegals already here no more deserve a path to citizenship than a bank robber who makes and “undocumented withdrawal” deserves an early path to freedom. They no more deserve a path to citizenship than a person who breaks into your house deserves a birger and a beer.

When senators killed a promising immigration compromise in June,

The only thing that crock of $#it “promised” was more illegals flowing into the country, more people sucking off of the government teat, more strain on the wallets of taxpayers here legally, and absolutely no reduction of the size of the problem. We were “promised” tough enforcement and an end to the problem when the ill-advised amnesty was passed under Reagan, and we didn’t get squat.

they irresponsibly tossed the problem to places like Hazleton, where the problem is only being amplified.

No, until Clinton’s butt buddy in a robe threw out the law, Hazelton was not amplifying the problem – it was eliminating it by making life tough for people who have no legal right to be here.
Sure, outside of guns this is my #1 hotbutton issue and the issue that motivated me to vote third party in 2004, but really this is only one of the many ways that USA Today proves to be a lousy value for the money unless you like their admittedly decent puzzle page. Even their sports section is liberal – if you don’t believe me, read their constant articles about teams with Indian nicknames, Title IX and so on.


For their continued support of illegals and insistence that America swallow lax law enforcement and a flawed “comprehensive” amnesty, USA Today earns my very first Rabbit Pellet of the Week.

Oh thank GOD!!!!

Tuesday, July 31st, 2007

I’m so relieved that these people will only bump uglies – and I do mean UGLIES – with their own, retarded kind! Thank you!!!


A new phenomenon in New Zealand is taking the idea of you are what you eat to the extreme.

Vegansexuals are people who do not eat any meat or animal products, and who choose not to be sexually intimate with non-vegan partners whose bodies, they say, are made up of dead animals.

And here’s another reason why I believe none of us here would ever want to mate with these oozing morons. No oral?!?!?!?


One vegan respondent from Christchurch said: “I believe we are what we consume, so I really struggle with bodily fluids, especially sexually.”

And now… to make you REALLY nauseous, here’s a photo of two of these dimwits.

Ready?

D.C. Gun Ban Helps Keep Shootings Down to Six in Twelve Hours

Saturday, July 21st, 2007

Thanks to the gun ban in D.C, which was enacted shortly after quick-thinking politicians realized that anyone who wants to commit gun crime would promptly get rid of his gun if there were suddenly another new law to break, the number of shootings east of the Anacostia River within a 12-hour period from Thursday to yesterday was kept down to six (see article linked above), and the number of people who were wounded in that same 12-hour period was limited to a mere 11, a true testimony to the effectiveness of this clever law.

Through our exclusive contacts, the Sniper Staff arranged an interview with two of the shooters involved in the incident, both of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity.

“Hey, I wanted to shoot a lot more people, but these things are banned so I only keep a few on hand,” said the shooter. “If they were legal I’d carry six or seven instead of four.”

Another shooter was quick to praise the gun ban: “Those guys I shot in the back and in the ass might have shot back at me if not for the gun ban. I could have been killed. It’s only because of the gun ban and the wisdom of those who passed it that I’m standing here today.”

Immigration: We’re Screwed.

Wednesday, June 27th, 2007
George Voinovich, RINO, Ohio

I listen to Sean Hannity’s radio show maybe five times a year (I’ve never seen his TV show). Just my luck, I was tuned in today.

Hannity was interviewing George Voinovich, and I seriously haven’t heard anyone so incoherent since the last car accident I witnessed. Voinovich didn’t know what the Fairness Doctrine was, he thought Kay Bailey Hutchinson’s “touchback” amendment to the immigration amnesty bill passed (it failed, 53-45, and he was there during the vote), he couldn’t answer direct questions without sidestepping or trying to duck out (yes, this is typical of politicians, but most do it with some degree of skill), he went into an insane tirade about how nobody was going to intimidate him just because some of his constituents have called to complain about the amnesty bill, etc. He tried to leave the interview when Hannity didn’t buy his tripe, saying Hannity wasn’t interested in listening, and then practically had a meltdown when Hannity told him he could have the entire hour.

I listen to Hannity very rarely because I don’t much care for his pit bull style of interview / debate; he generally grabs onto one point and beats it to death, and it bores the hell out of me. In this case, though, Hannity was reserved, respectful, tackled more than one point at once, but he wouldn’t let Voinovich skip out of one question: “Have you guys done a cost analysis to see what this bill will cost taxpayers in terms of Medicare, Social Security, etc?” Voinovich first tried to answer “yes” and then claimed he was talking about dollars which would be spent in border security (you should have heard this, it was insane – made no sense at all), he tried to digress as much as possible, and stammered like a kid choking on an Oreo when Hannity brought up the same question again. Voinovich finally took his ball and stomped off home like a drama queen.

I don’t know if Voinovich usually sounds like that much of a dolt or if he simply got his ass handed to him on a platter by Hannity, but it sent chills up my spine. I know the fix is on to pass the amnesty, but to what degree I really don’t think I understood until listening to Voinovich make Gary Condit’s performance in front of Connie Chung look smooth and professional. Voinovich truly sounded mentally ill, but in between his ramblings you could hear how determined our elected officials are to sell this country down the river.

If you know of a radio station that streams Hannity’s show late, or if you know how to download any of his earlier shows (his site might offer podcasts, I don’t own an iPod so I don’t know how this stuff is done), you’ve got to hear this. Hannity just said he might rerun the interview tomorrow and he will rerun it during the last half hour of his show today (5:30-6:00 p.m. EST), so you still have a chance to hear it. This interview is beyond belief.

Those of us here legally who pay taxes (not just sales taxes, mind you) are screwed. I guess I was 99% sure before, but was George Voinovich who convinced me completely. I don’t know what he was offered for his vote, but my guess is that Cincinnati is getting a new bus station and Columbus can expect a shiny new performing arts center. Whether it be cloture tomorrow and final passage Friday or sometime next week, the screwing is coming. Bend over and prepare to take pork and pipe in that same area of your person where Voinovich stores his head in his.

Stupid Is as Stupid Does

Saturday, June 23rd, 2007

Hey, folks, remember Cameron Diaz? The star of the most overrated comedy of all time (“There’s Something About Mary”), the one who told Oprah Winfrey’s audience “Women have so much to lose. I mean, we could lose the right to our bodies. If you think that rape should be legal, then don’t vote. But if you think that you have a right to your body, then you should vote.” before the 2004 elections?

Well, the dumb (expletive deleted) is in the news again, and this time it looks like she wasn’t even trying – she just let her natural talents take her as far as they could. While touring in Peru, the stupid (expletive deleted) wore a green canvas bag with a red star and the words “Serve the People” printed in Chinese on the flap, popular slogans of Mao Zedong. It seems that Cameron forgot about those pesky communist insurgencies in Peru in the 80′s and 90′s that took out just under seventy thousand people, and that it was the Maoist Shining Path that was responsible.

These bags are sold in some world capitals as trendy fashion accessories, so Commie Cameron bought one to show how cool she is and took it straight to Peru. Open memo to the (expletive deleted) airhead: hey, Cameron, even David Duke left his swastikas home before visiting Paris, you (expletive deleted) idiot.
So, heartfelt congratulations to the moronic (expletive deleted) Cameron Diaz for offending an entire country with her ignorance. She’s been offending at least half of America for quite some time now, so it’s high time she turned her talents on others. Way to go, Cameron, you brainless (expletive deleted) (expletive deleted). Small wonder Justin Timberlake dumped your dumb ass, you (expletive deleted) imbecile.

Only a Proctologist Could Plug This Mouth Shut

Tuesday, June 19th, 2007

Have you ever heard the term “Mister Irrelevant?”

It’s used to describe the last man taken every year in the NFL draft, but it would be far more aptly used to describe our buddy Jimmy Carter, the national disgrace who continues to badmouth America in front of anyone misguided enough to give a rat’s ass about what the idiot says.

Today in Dublin, Carter spewed forth exactly the sort of verbal diarrhea you’d expect from him: that the US has abandoned its role as a “champion of human rights” in the aftermath of the 9/11/01 attacks. The crusty old pacifist assbag pointed to the “torture” of detainees, the (highly justified) denial of the applicability of the Geneva Convention and the so-called “erosion of civil liberties” within the United States, blah, blah, yak, yak, chirp, chirp. In order to butter up the audience, Carter added that Ireland has become the pre-eminent voice for human rights in the European Union. Ireland will, of course, retain that status until Carter visits another European Union country to give the same speech.

If Jimmy Carter irritates you as much as he irritates me, you can take comfort in the one silver lining I was able to find: after a quick scan through Google news, I discovered that the only American news sources which even bothered to report Carter’s presence in Ireland were a handful of Georgia television stations. Carter routinely travels all over the world and gives speeches like this, and even though this is an former President of the United States who is preaching to the same choir that the New York Times sings to, not even the NYT gives him any real coverage anymore.
Two words: “Mister Irrelevant.”