Posts Tagged ‘Middle East’

Obama: Weak Military Leader According To Poll

Wednesday, March 30th, 2011

(Reuters) – Only 17 percent of Americans see President Barack Obama as a strong and decisive military leader, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll taken after the United States and its allies began bombing Libya.

Nearly half of those polled view Obama as a cautious and consultative commander-in-chief and more than a third see him as indecisive in military matters.

Obama was widely criticized in 2009 for his months-long consultations with senior aides and military chiefs on whether to send more troops to Afghanistan. Critics called it dithering, but he said such a big decision required careful deliberation. He eventually dispatched 30,000 more troops.

But Obama is facing mounting discontent among opposition Republicans and from within his own Democratic Party over the fuzzy aims of the U.S.-led mission in Libya and the lack of a clearly spelled-out exit strategy for U.S. forces.

If the Libya mission becomes a foreign policy mess, mixed with perceptions Obama is a weak military leader, it could spell trouble for him in the 2012 presidential election.

Yeah. I’m sure this will haunt him in 2012 just like smoking crack and hiring hookers haunted Marion Barry during his multiple campaigns and multiple wins in DC. People won’t give a rat’s ass how incompetent Obama was or how fickle his foreign policy was; they just think he’s cool so he’ll win again.

I mean, how the hell do you reconcile taking as long as Obama took to decide whether or not to take action against the drag queen in chief in Libya? Well, you don’t. And by the way, it was NOT in our national interest to engage our military there.

Islamic Jihad Fighters In Libya? I Am Soooooo Shocked

Friday, March 25th, 2011

Not.

Shortly after unrest broke out in eastern Libya in mid-February, reports emerged that an “Islamic Emirate” had been declared in the eastern Libyan town of Darnah and that, furthermore, the alleged head of that Emirate, Abdul-Hakim al-Hasadi, was a former detainee at the American prison camp in Guantánamo. The reports, which originated from Libyan government sources, were largely ignored or dismissed in the Western media.

Now, however, al-Hasadi has admitted in an interview with the Italian newspaper Il Sole 24 Ore that he fought against American forces in Afghanistan. (Hat-tip: Thomas Joscelyn at the Weekly Standard.) Al-Hasadi says that he is the person responsible for the defense of Darnah — not the town’s “Emir.” In a previous interview with Canada’s Globe and Mail, he claimed to have a force of about 1,000 men and to have commanded rebel units in battles around the town of Bin Jawad.

And this is exactly why I didn’t want us getting involved over there in Libya or any of the other “popular” revolutions in the MIddle East and Africa: we don’t know who’s behind it all. Sure, we keep getting told that these are popular uprisings but how are we supposed to be 100% sure of that? And if aren’t 100% sure of the real source of the unrest, why the hell are we offering aid? I mean, we if Al Qaeda or the Taliban or the Muslim Brotherhood or any branch of Islamic Jihad are behind this (which I seriously believe is the case), aren’t we slitting our own throats by helping them? We’re now helping enforce a no-fly zone to help the people that were dancing in the streets when the World Trade Center fell. We’re taking out ADA sites to enforce a no-fly zone so that Moammar Ghadaffi and his sick regime can be toppled, for what? So a worse regime can take over? Unfortunately I think the only reason we haven’t done anything to take him out previously (except for when Ronnie Reagan put some smart bombs in his kids’ windows) is because it’s better to have the devil you know than the devil you don’t.

Now we’re not only banking on the devil we don’t know; we’re helping him take over Hell.

Leading Experts Agree That Jihadists Want A Mega-Caliphate… Why Can’t Our Own Citizens Get The Picture?

Tuesday, August 28th, 2007

And this opinion isn’t just that of the west, but of moderate Arabs in the Middle East.

Yeah, it’s all our fault… As usual

Wednesday, May 23rd, 2007

So Iraqi kids are growing up to be a bunch of mini murderers…. They’re growing up to be insurgent terrorist scum. This is unsurprising. It’s a Middle Eastern phenomenon. What is absolutely galling is that CNN is painting it as OUR FAULT????

“I’m going to bomb, bomb, bomb the school with everybody in it,” said Omar Hussein, as he clutched a pink toy airplane.

At another point, a girl enthusiastically sang, “I give a knife to my father to slaughter the chicken. He gives me a machine gun and a rifle. Now, I am a soldier in the liberation army.”

The same kindergarten taught up to 180 children just four years ago, before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq that toppled Saddam Hussein. Today, the class has just 16 children, a result of families fleeing the war or parents keeping their children at home, fearful of bombs or kidnap gangs.

So we overthrow a psychotic, murderous dictator, are being inundated with violent insurgents for our trouble, and somehow it’s our fault that Iraqi kids are violent?

Is this our fault?

How about this?

And this? It’s all our fault, right? The violent Middle East shithole wouldn’t breed murderous animals if it wasn’t for us?

Blow me, CNN!